Search this Blog

Monday, November 14, 2011

Spanning- tree priority with VPC

We are deploying a pair of Nexus 3064 switches in a VPC and they will handle all of the Layer 3 Routing and switching for a small data center. Do we need to test their spanning tree priority the same if they will be configured as a VPC? Example:Primary - 4096, secondary - 4096.

Having the same bridge priority is not a requirement to maintain vPC consistency. Even if you had the highest bridge priority in the secondary, your vPC primary would forward BPDUs in vPC domain. quoted from "Cisco NX-OS Virtual PortChannel: Fundamental Design Concepts..." "vPC by default ensures that only the primary switch forwards BPDUs on vPCs. This modification is strictly limited tovPC member ports. As a result, the BPDUs that may be received by the secondary vPC peer on a vPC port areforwarded to the primary vPC peer through the peer link for processing. Note: Non-vPC ports operate like regular spanning-tree ports. The special behavior of the primary vPC memberapplies uniquely to ports that are part of a vPC."

Please click here for the Design Guide for Cisco NX-OS
Please click here for spanning tree design guidelines

Having the same (highest) priority would also be no problem because in the non-vPC context (i.e. classic spanning tree topology) there would be a tie-breaker (lowest MAC) to elect the root.


Citation - This blog post does not reflect original content from the author. Rather it summarizes content that are relevant to the topic from different sources in the web. The sources might include any online discussion boards, forums, websites and others.

No comments :

Post a Comment

 
/* Google Analytics begin ----------------------------------------------- */ /* Google Analytics end ----------------------------------------------- */